Methods: Adolescent inhalant users incarcerated within the Missouri residential care system (N = 279) reported the perceived consequences of their inhalant use via a structured interview. Multivariate analyses were used to identify demographic and clinical predictors of adverse psychological, social, and behavioral consequences of inhalant use.
Results: Use of marijuana, “taking foolish risks,” getting into trouble, and driving a motor vehicle were among the most prevalent risky behaviors committed under the influence of inhalants. High frequency inhalant users were significantly more likely than moderate and low frequency users to experience a wide range of adverse biopsychosocial consequences of inhalant use. While intoxicated on inhalants, high frequency users were nearly three times as likely as low frequency users to commit acts of violence (50.6% to 13.7%, respectively) and vandalism (45.0% to 15.8%, respectively), and more than twice as likely to commit property crimes (53.1% to 18.9%, respectively) and drive a motor vehicle under the influence (49.4% to 23.2%, respectively). Certain risky behaviors and adverse health consequences, such as having unprotected sex or suffering serious physical injury while high on inhalants were multiplicatively more common among high frequency users than low frequency users, and intravenous drug use and suicide attempts were exponentially so. After controlling for lifetime inhalant use frequency, multiple linear regression analyses revealed that prior traumatic experiences and polysubstance abuse significantly predicted adverse inhalant-related consequences.
Conclusions and Implications: Inhalant abuse appears to result in severe psychosocial and physical health consequences. The likelihood of experiencing deleterious effects and committing antisocial or high risk behaviors during inhalant intoxication increases monotonically as a function of lifetime frequency of inhalant use. Because a large proportion of adolescent inhalant users engage in dangerous activities with the potential to inflict serious harm upon themselves and/or others, policymakers and clinicians alike would be prudent to prioritize such at-risk youth in future intervention and prevention efforts.