Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, qualitative and quantitative data from the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2013 were used to provide a profile of investigations involving medical neglect in Ontario in order to identify policy and practice implications. Investigations involving medical neglect for children age 0 to 15 were compared to other forms of maltreatment using descriptive and chi-square analyses. Qualitative analysis of case narratives followed the triangulation design validating quantitative data method to provide thematic support for the results of the quantitative analysis.
Results: An estimated 1,774 medical neglect investigations were conducted in Canada in 2008, representing 2% of all maltreatment investigations. Of the 1,774 medical neglect investigations, only 34% were substantiated (an estimated 610 investigations. Medical neglect investigations were most often referred by school personnel (19%), followed by a relative (9%), community physician (9%) or community health nurse (9%).
Several significant differences emerged with regard to child, caregiver and household characteristics. Investigations focusing on medical neglect were significantly more likely to involve infants; involve a child who failed to meet developmental milestones, had a physical disability, or had Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Medical neglect investigations were more likely to involve a caregiver who is a lone-parent; who has a mental health issue, few social supports, or a history of foster care/group home in childhood. Physical harm was more often noted for medical neglect investigations. The household’s primary source of income was more often social assistance/benefits and the worker was more likely to endorse that the family ran out of money for basic necessities in the past six months.
Qualitative analysis provided a rich description of six distinct forms of medical neglect leading to the initiation of a medical neglect investigation: neglect of dental needs, neglect of healthcare needs related to a specific medical condition, neglect of needs related to a developmental concern, neglect of mental health needs, failure to attend routine medical appointments and neglect of primary healthcare needs.
Conclusions and Implications: Our analysis provides further evidence that investigations focusing on medical neglect involve families with numerous child, caregiver and household-level needs requiring a coordinated service response. We suggest that categories of referral related to medical neglect could be used to guide the provision of services.