Methods: Data collection (2012-13) involved researcher-administered-structured-surveys of primary healthcare-clinic patients (n=254) using the K6, the PC-PTSD, and the Modified-MINI mental illness screens. Chi. Sq., ANOVA and Principal Component analysis provide descriptive statistics; Logistic regression evaluates risk-factors associated with unrecognized-positive-mental-health-screens.
Results: The sample (n=254) included 55% females and 45% males; aged 18-89, M=40.4(±13). 51.6% screened positive for mental illness, 11.4% (15 of 132) of whom spoke to their physician about mental illness or had an acknowledged record of psychological problems. Thus 88.6% (n=117) had unrecognized-positive-screens. Patient inability to access provider advice or assistance increased chances of having an unrecognized-positive-screen (EXP. B=.0.42; CI: 0.20-0.88) as did patients’ attribution of their mental illness to a physical Illness (EXP. B=5.26; CI: 2.36-11.74), negative attitudes toward the mentally ill (EXP. B=0.92.; CI: 0.86-0.98), female gender (EXP. B=2.20; CI: 1.22-3.95), and lower SES (EXP. B=0.66; CI: 0.48-0.89).
Conclusions: Large numbers of primary care patients screen positive for mental illness whose mental health needs are unrecognized. This seems to result from a perceived lack of access to provider advice—a relationship flaw in service provision. There is a need to address the psychological components of physical health care and self-stigma in the patient-provider contact. A focus on relationship building in primary care settings would significantly enhance the ability of the patient to share their mental health issues and perhaps greatly enhance health outcomes.