This study describes barriers to support for military-connected children who attend civilian schools. The purpose of this mixed-method study was to explore military-connected and school-based providers’ perspectives regarding what barriers challenge efforts to support military-connected children in civilian school settings.
Methods: Data came from a two-phased, mixed-method statewide needs assessment conducted between June 2011 and May 2012. First, semi-structured interviews were conducted in efforts to gain a representative perspective of military-connected (n = 8) and school-based (n = 8) providers who worked with military-connected children. Information gathered during these interviews helped guide the creation of a survey. Second, surveys (n = 105) were completed by school social workers employed within civilian schools.
Our sample was recruited using a snowball and judgment sample technique for interviews, followed by criterion and cluster sampling for surveys.
Interview data was audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed for themes using a content analysis data reduction approach. Survey responses were collected in Qualtrics and data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Results indicate that multiple barriers impact providers’ capacity to support military-connected children who attend civilian schools. We identified four barriers from the qualitative data, including: lack of military cultural competence among school-based educators; lack of bi-directional communication between military-connected and school-based providers; need for better systems to identify military-connected children; and competing demands between educational and mental health needs of military-connected children. Barriers within the quantitative data included: lack of coordination between schools and military organizations (76%); shortage of time (among school-based providers) (72%); financial costs (70%); transportation barriers (64%); and lack of training for school-based providers (60%).
Conclusion and Implications: This study shines a light on the importance of incorporating perspectives of military and school-based providers and their work with military-connected children in civilian school settings and highlights differences between schools with less visible military-connected populations. Providers who work in settings where there are fewer military-connected children may face additional challenges in identifying, tracking, and supporting military-connected children who may have few peers or access to support from other military-connected children in their situation.