Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted with SGMY (n=6,317). Inclusion: (1) 14-29; (2) SGMY; (3) and reside in the United States or Canada. Recruitment: facilitated via venue-based and purposive online sampling to agencies and on social media. Participants (M = 18.22, SD = 2.45) represented a range of identities (non-mutually exclusive categories). Sexuality: pansexual (29%), bisexual (26%), queer (21%), lesbian (15%), gay (15%), asexual (11%), and other (8%). Gender Identity: female (41%), non-binary (24%), male (17%), genderqueer (17%); trans/transgender (15%), and other (9%). Measures: (1) ACEs (Felitti et al., 1998); (2) Internalized Homo/Transphobia (modified Nungesser, 1983), (3) Interpersonal and Environmental LGBTQ Microaggression Subscales (Woodford et al., 2013) and (4) Depression subscale of the DSM–5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure. Descriptive analyses examined the prevalence of ACEs among SGMY. Using general linear modelling (GLM), regressions were conducted in SPSS to identify the contribution of ACEs, internalized homo/transphobia and minority stressors to SGMY depression.
Results: SGMY had high rates of trauma, reporting multiple ACEs (M = 2.93, SD = 2.42) including notably high prevalence rates of emotional abuse (51%) and living with a family member with mental illness (52%). Compared to national samples, ACE scores among SGMY were higher across 8 of the 10 categories. Based on results of the GLM, the model explained a significant proportion of variance in depression scores, adjusted R2 = .259, F(11, 3277) = 105.32, p < .001. In particular, ACEs, (b = 1.009, t(3277) = 12.842, p < .001), internalized homophobia (b = .432, t(3277) = 7.768, p < .001), interpersonal microaggressions (b = .212, t(3277) = 6.369, p < .001) and environmental microaggressions b = .419, t(3277) = 8.408, p < .001 significantly predicted depression.
Implications: SGMY reported a higher number of ACEs compared to the general population. Moreover, ACE scores and minority stressors notably impact SGMY depression. The high rates of childhood adversity, as well as interpersonal and environmental minority stressors experienced by SGMY underscore the need for more equitable and socially just systems of care that attend to prevention and intervention needs of this high-risk population. This study, the first to examine ACEs among SGMY, expands knowledge about SGMY risks to include significant childhood trauma as well as minority stressors. This more accurate and nuanced understanding of SGMY experiences highlights the need for empirically based interventions that are both affirmative and trauma-informed.