Methods: A systematic review was conducted utilizing the five-step framework outlined by Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, and Antes (2011) in the book titled Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine. The five steps are: (1) frame questions for the review, (2) identify relevant work, (3) assess the quality of the studies, (4) summarize the evidence and (5) interpret the findings.
Results: Findings from this study suggest that the etiology of BPD is complex and constructed of psychological, biological, and social factors. More specifically, this review found that: (1) the symptoms of BPD are well understood and the etiology is not, (2) the dominant discourse about the etiology of BPD is built almost entirely from the psychological literature with no social work critique and (3) the etiology of BPD has only been examined from the individual and microsystems levels, neglecting to consider macro levels, such as health and mental healthcare policies.
Conclusions and Implications: Increasing awareness of the etiology of BPD within the social work literature has many potential positive implications to social work policy and practice. As social workers, we play a versatile role in the healthcare system and to be the most effective advocates, we must expand our understanding of BPD so that we can create more effective mental health services, enhanced health care policy, and better quality of life for individuals and families living with BPD. A novel framework for understanding the cause of BPD through a social work lens and ecological systems perspective will be presented with a focus on systemic and macro level implications. Treatment and policy implications for social workers will be discussed.