Abstract: Examining Association between Resource Curse and Neonatal Mortality Rate (Society for Social Work and Research 22nd Annual Conference - Achieving Equal Opportunity, Equity, and Justice)

Examining Association between Resource Curse and Neonatal Mortality Rate

Schedule:
Saturday, January 13, 2018: 8:44 AM
Liberty BR Salon I (ML 4) (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Aytakin Huseynli, MSW, Phd Student, social work, St. Louis, MO
  • Background and Purpose: Natural resources such as oil, gas, and minerals play a dominant role in 81 countries covering 3.5 billion people in the world. These countries produce 85% of world’s petroleum, 90% diamonds and 80% of copper. Profits from these resources in the world constituted $2.6 trillion in 2010. 65 countries out 81 are developing countries and despite their resource abundance, they are still poor. Association between the abundance of natural resource and negative growth is well established since 1980’s and it is called resource curse. It is hypothesized that spillovers from resource curse affect the social welfare of these countries. To test this hypothesis, the study compared all developing resource-rich and resource-poor countries in terms of neonatal mortality rate. Neonatal mortality rate is the number of neonates dying before reaching 28 days of age or number of still births. It is often used as an indicator of wellbeing and health of citizens. The purpose of this study was to extend the resource curse theory to neonatal mortality rate to explore the possible association between them.
  • Methods: The study used cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative research design. Panel data on infant mortality rate came from UNICEF that covered 188 countries for years 2000-2010. 143 same income level countries out of 188 were included in the analysis. 81 of them were resource-rich and 62 resource-poor countries. List of resource-rich countries was taken from Natural Resource Governance Institute. The sample size was categorized and 2 groups were created such as resource-rich and resource-poor countries. R Statistical software was used to conduct descriptive and one-way repeated measures ANOVA to answer the proposed research question.
  • Results: A statistically significant difference was found among two groups of countries F(1.109, 156.334)=1.16, p=.290. Based on the value of partial eta squared only 1 % of the variance in the model accounted for the natural resources and the rest 99% by Error. There was the statistically significant difference in the neonatal mortality rate between resource-rich and resource-poor countries. Findings of the study revealed that resource curse was correlated with the higher neonatal mortality rate in resource-rich countries.
  • Conclusions and Implications: The resource curse was correlated with higher neonatal mortality rates in developing resource-rich countries. In other words, children do not benefit from poor countries’ natural resource wealth. Research implication of this study is conducting further research on the situation of vulnerable groups in developing resource-rich countries to get detailed understanding since these countries vary in terms of advancement, availability, and access to social welfare and health care policies and services. Policy implication for governments of these countries is to design effective social welfare and health care policies to protect vulnerable groups especially children from negative effects of the resource curse. Practice implications for social work and social policy communities are to enter into the natural resource industry to advocate for vulnerable groups and to ensure fair distribution of natural resource wealth among all citizens to eliminate negative spillovers of resource curse on social welfare and health care systems.