Methods: Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey using a convenience and purposive sampling. A total of 251 males participated in this study. The participants were mostly African Americans (93.6%) with a mean age of 58.3 years (SD=15.3). While 38.6% of participants were married, 33.9% of participants were separated, and 12% were divorced. Only 23.1% of participants were fulltime or part-time employees, and 66.5 % of participants had an annual household income below $29,900.
Results: Bartlett’s test of sphericity indicated that this data set is appropriate for factor analysis (χ2= 640.7, p<.001), and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy indicated a value of .736, which showed that the degree of common variance is good. The factors loading for each item are all greater than the cutoff point ( <.4), and 10 items are retained in the final model. The three factors were generated when using a basic scree-test and eigenvalue at <1.0 criteria: Modesty, crisis orientation, and family support. These three factors which were rotated to position of maximum orthogonality in five iterations, explain 59.3 % of variances. The results for internal consistency for each factor showed mixed outcomes. While the alphas for modesty and crisis orientation was good (α= .868 for modesty and α=.634 for crisis orientation), the alpha for family support was not acceptable (α=.485).
Implications: To understand the influences of cultural barriers to cancer screening among African American males, empirical evaluation of the psychometric properties of the cultural barriers scale should precede further multivariate analyses. The findings showed that overall, the scale had good psychometric properties among African American men, but some items need to be revised or dropped because of low internal consistency.