Session: An Examination of Decision Thresholds across the Child Welfare Service Continuum: Opportunities for Efficacy (Society for Social Work and Research 24th Annual Conference - Reducing Racial and Economic Inequality)

107 An Examination of Decision Thresholds across the Child Welfare Service Continuum: Opportunities for Efficacy

Schedule:
Friday, January 17, 2020: 2:00 PM-3:30 PM
Marquis BR Salon 10, ML 2 (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
Cluster: Child Welfare (CW)
Symposium Organizer:
Barbara Fallon, PhD, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto
Reforming both the objectives and structure of the child welfare system is a subject of increasingly impassioned debate. Child protection agencies are required by the general public and funders to account for how services decisions are made including the choice to investigate an allegation of abuse and neglect, the provision of ongoing child welfare services and placement in out of home care. Various solutions have been viewed as the ultimate resolution to the poor outcomes experienced by children and families and to capping the spiraling costs of investigations and service provision. Integral to any potential solution is a more precise understanding of how decisions are informed along the service continuum.

In Ontario, Canada's largest province, the decision to screen in a case for an investigation has recently come under scrutiny. An incorrect decision may result in the misuse of resources, cause unnecessary stress to families who do not require an investigation and be perceived as a threat for already vulnerable families. Two papers examined the screening decision using administrative data to construct large entry cohorts with consistent results. Both found that the screening decision resulted in high sensitivity but poor specificity. The analyses also identified the types of cases that are more likely to result in a false positive finding (inappropriate discipline and a caregiver with several risk factors identified). These data were used to inform in-depth discussions with front-line workers about decision-making thresholds in two agency-wide initiatives. Ongoing analysis and increased awareness of the screening decision at these organizations has shown improved specificity.

Trocme et al (2014) have identified a taxonomy that divides child welfare cases into those requiring urgent protection versus those with chronic needs in order to assist with the development of a more tailored service response across the service continuum. In Ontario, the mandate of child protections services includes families where there has been no specific allegation of maltreatment but rather the focus is on the assessment of risk factors that are likely result in future maltreatment. Using provincially representative cross-sectional data from 2013, this paper examined the predictors of transfers to ongoing services for both urgent and chronic investigations. An investigating worker's concern about the future maltreatment of children explained a significant proportion of the variance for the decision to transfer to ongoing services regardless of the allegation that was investigated. The low threshold for risk evident in the screening decision was also present in the findings of this paper.

Finally, using an entry cohort constructed from administrative data, families and children were tracked for two years in order to better understand the investigation, transfer to ongoing services and placement decision. Decisions about more intensive involvement with families were largely based on safety and risk assessments, which may be measuring the very same constructs that bring a family to the attention of child welfare in Ontario. Together these papers examine the efficacy of the child welfare service response which should identify situations that require further intervention and ameliorate the effects of child abuse and neglect.

* noted as presenting author
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Screening Decision in a Canadian Child Protection Agency
Kate Schumaker, PhD, Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto
Critical Analysis of Organizational Risk Threshold
Jill Stoddart, PhD, University of Toronto; Leyco Wilson, MA, Family & Children's Services of the Waterloo REgion
The Role of Risk in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Longitudinal Examination of Transfers to Ongoing Services
Bryn King, PhD, University of Toronto; Tara Black, PhD, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto; Barbara Fallon, PhD, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto; Yu Lung, University of Toronto
Investigations Involving Urgent Protection Concerns Vs. Chronic Needs: Are There Differences in Post-Investigation Service Decisions?
Bryn King, PhD, University of Toronto; Joanne Filippelli, PhD, University of Toronto; Barbara Fallon, PhD, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto; Nicolette Joh-Carnella, BA, University of Toronto
See more of: Symposia