Methods: This secondary data analysis included waves 1 and 3 of the National Longitudinal data from adolescents to adult health in a sample of sexually active Black males (N= 253), mean age of 16 years. The independent variables included: father communication, bonding, and relationships. Dependent variable: HIV testing. A multinomial analysis assessed what factors contributed to or prevented HIV testing.
Results: The overall model was statistically significant F (12, 42) = 7.89, p<.001. Results suggest father-son bonding was statistically significant and negatively associated with HIV testing (B = - .40, p<.01). Father –son communication was statistically significant and positively associated with HIV testing (B= 3.30; p<.05). Black males who reported an increase in father son communication were more likely to get tested for HIV multiple times.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that father-son relationships are important to adolescent male sexual development and serve as a protective factor against threats to sexual health. Future studies should be designed to investigate the cognitive mechanisms through which father-son bonding and communication may impact HIV testing. Moreover, family-based sexual health promotion interventions should take into account the protective effects of healthy father-son bonding and communication on adolescent male sexual health.