Methods: We used purposive sampling to recruit 33 participants for interviews at one large public University in the Northeast. Participants included both students who utilized and those who did not utilize the victim services center on campus after experiencing IPV. The sample is predominantly female (91%) and diverse, with 55% of the students identifying as White, 12% as Black, 24% as Asian, and 21% as Hispanic/LatinX. To recruit participants, flyers, and electronic announcements were used. Interviews were conducted by two individuals with a master of social work. Interviews elicited participants’ overall disclosure experiences, decisions around disclosure, as well as perceptions and awareness of on-campus victim services. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded thematically using of grounded theory coding methods.
Results: Data analysis reveals a trajectory of help-seeking on campus that is iterative based on evolving information and social supports. Many participants, both help-seeking and non-help seeking, reported that they first disclosed to an informal source of support, most often a friend. However, differences emerged between help-seeking and non-help seeking participants in the type of disclosure response that was received, which ultimately impacted help-seeking trajectories. Data suggests that most of the help-seeking participants received a positive disclosure response, and often the receipt of warm referrals by informal sources helped survivors "see" themselves in on-campus victim services, such that their experiences were worthy of intervention and that on campus services could prove to be helpful. However, many non-help seeking survivors were met with insensitive reactions by informal sources which facilitated participants to not see themselves as worthy or eligible of receiving assistance from the victim service provider on campus. Such participants described the belief that using the services on campus would not make a difference in their healing process, and this was regardless of participants’ awareness of such services.
Implications: The results of this study have implications for on-campus services. It is important to develop programs that will help improve students’ ability to respond to disclosures of IPV, as well as increase their awareness of services to refer services to and educate peers. Additionally, findings highlight the need to improve access to broader psychoeducation information regarding services available to students and to be more intentional in victim services’ outreach efforts.