Methods: This study utilized a multiple-case design and a unique combination of qualitative GIS methodologies to explore how urban adolescents define, navigate, and engage their surrounding environment. Twelve young adults ages 16 through 21 were recruited from several urban youth centers. The sample consisted of six males and six females, all who identified as either African-American or Latinx. In sum, 85 sedentary and walking interviews were conducted in the participants’ neighborhoods and over 100 hours of field observation over the course of one year; each case was interviewed 7-8 times. Braun & Clark’s (2006) method of thematic analysis was used to analyze all qualitative data. GPS data were also collected and analyzed to develop a “real-time” understanding of the spaces across which youth were navigating.
Results: The findings from this work suggest that how youth perceive and move throughout space is a complex process, stemming from the interaction of structural and social systems; and highlight the value of understanding varying resident experiences when considering definitions of neighborhood. Through urban youth narratives and walking interviews, we find that place is tied to development, particularly as it relates to the construction of identity through social ties and relationships. The GPS data show that the definition of neighborhood is fluid and complex, particularly when compared to traditional census tract measures. Additionally, the process through which individuals create meaning out of place is not static. Rather, there are mutual exchanges between the resident and their surrounding systems, across many different dimensions of place.
Conclusions and Implications: The social ties and attachment associated with neighborhood, are important aspects of youth development. Our findings suggest that place should be considered and defined with increased nuance, bounded not by arbitrary census designations, but rather resident knowledge and perspective. This study fills a gap in the literature by integrating youth voice into our understanding of how to measure and define neighborhood. The implications of this work suggest that place-centered interventions and policies should remain at the forefront of policy agendas, committing investment in resource deprived urban spaces. Moreover, given the fluid boundaries of neighborhood (social and concrete), service providers should work closely with local residents to ensure they are being fully responsive to the needs of their target population and successfully creating access to services within complex social and physical spaces.