Building on a socio-ecological model of academic and wellbeing outcomes of LGBTQ+ students, we 1) examine the relationship between students’ participation in LGBTQ2S+ student centres/groups and their wellbeing, and 2) explore the potential mediating role of sense of belonging in the centre/group-student wellbeing relationship.
Methods: A sample of 3,878 LGBTQ2S+ university students in Ontario, Canada, completed an online survey. They were recruited through posters/flyers on campus, social media posts and outreach to student services and LGBTQ2S+ student groups. The sample consisted of 84% undergraduate students, 23% trans, 48% bisexual, 24% students of color, and 24% living with a disability; average age was 21.9 years. Participants completed internally consistent scales assessing campus climate (incivility, victimization; Matthews & Ritter, 2016), mental distress (Kroenke et al., 2009), positive mental health (Keyes, 2009), and sense of belonging on campus (Dugan et al., 2012). Three author-created questions measured LGBTQ2S+ centre/group participation: participation since the beginning of the school year (yes/no), frequency of participation, and perceptions of support from the group/centre. Mediated multiple regressions were conducted in SPSS using the PROCESS Macro (Hayes, 2013).
Results: 25% of the students reported they had participated in a LGBTQ2S+ centre/group. Each LGBTQ2S+ participation variable was associated with lower mental distress, after controlling for campus climate. These findings were explained by increased levels of belonging associated with centres/groups participation, with significant indirect effects of centres/groups participation variables on mental distress through sense of belonging (indirect effects 95% CIs for the effects of participation [-.19, -.06], frequency of participation [-.11, -.02]; perceived support from participation [-.14, -.03]). Similarly, the three participation variables were associated with greater positive mental health, indirectly through increased sense of belonging (indirect effects 95% CIs for the effects of participation [.49, 1.55]; frequency of participation [.11, .90]; perceived support from participation [.26, 1.09]).
Implications and Conclusion: The results underscore the importance of campuses creating and supporting LGBTQ2S+ student centres/groups. The findings suggest that these centres/groups provide opportunities to develop one’s sense of belonging on campus, which can contribute to students’ wellbeing. However, the low proportion of students participating in LGBTQ2S+ centres/groups indicates the need for further research to explore barriers and facilitators to participation. Prospective research is needed to establish the protective role of participating in LGBTQ2S+ student centres/groups in helping students to cope with minority stressors and other challenges over the course of their education programs.