Methods: Using Washington State administrative data sets from 2010 through 2017, I examine nearly 5,000 low-wage, non-custodial parents, all of whom with active child support orders around the time of a local minimum wage increase. As a longitudinal cohort study, I compare non-custodial parents who worked in jurisdictions subject to local minimum wage increases to those who did not.
Results: For this cohort of low-wage earning, non-custodial parents, the average hourly wage was $12/hr (s.d. $2/hr) with a median at $11/hr. For over 50% of the quarters worked, these parents’ hourly wages were within $2 of the local minimum, and in no quarter did their wages exceed $19/hr. The average monthly child support order was $203 per month (s.d. $111), with a median of $187. The average child support payment, however, amounted to $98 per month (s.d. $129), with a median of $0, reflecting the divide between the level at which the order is set and the amount paid towards that order, particularly among low-wage workers. While exposures to higher minimum wage rates varied over the 8 years of the study, 28% of this cohort worked at least some time in a jurisdiction that saw a minimum wage increase above the state minimum. When working in jurisdictions with higher minimum wage levels, workers made higher child support payments: $199 per month on average when working in jurisdictions with higher minimum wages compared to $128 per month otherwise.
Conclusions and Implications: While many factors influence consistent and full child support payments, results in this study suggest that payments could be bolstered whenever low-wage workers are employed in jurisdictions that see an increase in the local minimum wage. These results could add additional support for an increase in the federal minimum wage, and by extension, possibly benefit families that rely on child support.