Abstract: The Consequences of Post-Divorce Placement Arrangements in Finland and the US (Society for Social Work and Research 26th Annual Conference - Social Work Science for Racial, Social, and Political Justice)

The Consequences of Post-Divorce Placement Arrangements in Finland and the US

Schedule:
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Independence BR F, ML 4 (Marriott Marquis Washington, DC)
* noted as presenting author
Quentin Riser, PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Mari Haapanen, PhD, Research Assistant, University of Turku, Finland
Judi Bartfeld, PhD, Professor, University of Wisconsin - Madison, WI
Lawrence Berger, PhD, Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Mia Hakovirta, PhD, Academic Researcher, University of Turku, Finland
Anneli Miettinen, Researcher, Kela (Social Security Department in Finland), Helsinki, Finland
Background/Purpose: Divorce negatively impacts many families. Families (and sometimes courts) make important decisions regarding child physical custody arrangements following divorce, and shared parenting arrangements (SP) are increasingly common in the US. Such SP agreements may differentially affect child support outcomes and arrangement satisfaction, significantly altering US child support policy. Furthermore, some of these relationships may vary across countries and reshape how other countries approach child support policy. Prior research examining the associations between SP and family outcomes, however, has primarily focused on US samples. The central objective of the present study is to provide a comparative analysis across two western countries of associations of post-divorce physical custody arrangements with child support outcomes and arrangement satisfaction in samples drawn from Finland and Wisconsin (representing the US). This work enables us to explore whether there are similar outcomes in two distinct country contexts. This study also catalyzes discussion on well-suited policy approaches designed to support children and families that are left economically vulnerable following divorce.

Two aims guide this work: (a) describing child, maternal, and paternal characteristics of families with variant post-divorce physical custody arrangements, and (b) estimating associations of children’s post-divorce arrangements with child support and arrangement satisfaction, net of family characteristics. Each of these questions will be answered in Wisconsin and Finnish samples separately, and results will be compared.

Methods: The present study draws from surveys of divorced parents fielded in Wisconsin and Finland, which were designed to enable comparative analysis. Wisconsin participants were drawn from two cohorts of Wisconsin Court Record Data (WCRD) and administered the Wisconsin Parents Survey 7 -- 11 years following divorce. The final study sample consisted of 322 mothers with sole physical custody, 434 mothers with SP, and 434 fathers with SP at final judgment. Finnish participants were administered a survey in 2019, and they were classified as residential (90% of which were mothers) and non-residential (70% of which were fathers) parents. The final study sample consisted of about 557 resident parents with sole physical custody, 491 resident parents with SP, and 521 non-resident parents with SP.

Results: Preliminary US findings suggest 68.6% of mothers with sole placement, 58.0% of mothers with SP, and 56.7% of fathers with SP are satisfied with arrangements at the time of the interview. Finland findings suggest 84.0% of mothers with sole placement, 91.0% of mothers with SP, and 90.0% of fathers with SP are satisfied with arrangements at the time of the survey. Preliminary US results from logistic regression models show mothers with sole placement are significantly more satisfied with arrangements at the time of the divorce, the year prior to the interview, and at the time of the interview, and mothers with SP more commonly report receiving all child support than mothers with sole placements.

Conclusions and Implications: Findings will be discussed in the context of current dialogue on changing trends in post-divorce arrangements, and the need for social policy responses that attend to shifting family dynamics.