Abstract: Exploring the Most Important and Most Needed Services for Families Formed through Adoption and Guardianship (Society for Social Work and Research 26th Annual Conference - Social Work Science for Racial, Social, and Political Justice)

Exploring the Most Important and Most Needed Services for Families Formed through Adoption and Guardianship

Schedule:
Friday, January 14, 2022
Independence BR C, ML 4 (Marriott Marquis Washington, DC)
* noted as presenting author
Laura Marra, MSSW, Research Director, Texas Institute for Child & Family Wellbeing, Austin, TX
Kevin White, PhD, Assistant Professor, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
Monica Faulkner, PHD, Director, Texas Institute for Child & Family Wellbeing, Austin, TX
Nancy Rolock, PhD, Henry L. Zucker Associate Professor of Social Work Practice, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Kerrie Ocasio, PhD, Assistant Research Professor, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Valerie Wood, PhD, Research and Evaluation Core Function Coordinator, University of Vermont, VT
Rowena Fong, EdD, Ruby Lee Piester Centennial Professor, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
Background and Purpose: The National Center for Quality Improvement on Adoption and Guardianship (QIC-AG) partnered with the Vermont Department for Children and Family Services, to survey all families in Vermont who were formed through adoption or guardianship. The survey sought to understand family life, parenting, child wellbeing and service needs post-permanence. This paper explored (1) the services and supports that respondents identified as most important for families, (2) unmet service and support needs, and (3) barriers that limit access to those services and supports.

Methods: The Vermont Permanency Survey was developed and sent to all caregivers who were receiving an adoption or guardianship assistance agreement subsidy in Vermont (n=809, a 55% response rate). Caregivers were asked three open-ended questions about services for families formed through adoption or guardianship: (1) three most important services families received, (2) three services most needed but hard to get or not available, and (3) three barriers to accessing services. Using a content analysis, responses were organized into initial categories based on themes that emerged in the data using an open-coding approach. New codes were added when data did not fit the existing codes. Responses were coded independently by two trained coders. The coders met to review the themes, reviewed the codes that were different, and re-coded the discrepancies until a consensus could be reached. Level of agreement between raters was 86% on important services, 84% on needed services, and 76% on barriers.

Results: A little over half of the participants identified at least one important service (54%), while close to one fourth of participants listed at least one needed but hard to get service (28%) and one barrier to accessing services (27%). The most important services fell under two broad categories: family-supportive services and mental health services. Trainings, the names of specific agencies, and counseling services were mentioned most often. The most needed but hard to get services included counseling (particularly trauma-informed and adoption-specific), support groups, respite, and child care. In terms of barriers, caregivers commonly reported the location of services not being accessible, services or providers not existing, providers not being trauma-informed or knowledgeable about adoption-specific needs, and services not being covered by insurance. There was some variation in what families reported at the district level, and differences between kin and non-kin families were explored.

Conclusion and Implications: Because adoption and guardianship are complicated life-long journeys, it is important that families are able to access timely and relevant services. Overall, adoption-specific and trauma-informed mental health providers, accessible trainings, support groups, respite and childcare are needed services that are hard to get. Families often face difficulties in finding providers within their area that have the competence to meet their child’s needs, but these needs and challenges vary by location and urban or rural settings and should be addressed at the community level.