Abstract: Are Online Interventions Effective for Middle-Aged Overweight and Obese Adults? a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Society for Social Work and Research 27th Annual Conference - Social Work Science and Complex Problems: Battling Inequities + Building Solutions)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Mountain Standard Time Zone (MST).

SSWR 2023 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Phoenix A/B, 3rd floor. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 9. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

Are Online Interventions Effective for Middle-Aged Overweight and Obese Adults? a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Saturday, January 14, 2023
Valley of the Sun E, 2nd Level (Sheraton Phoenix Downtown)
* noted as presenting author
Omoshola Kehinde, MPH, Doctoral student, University of Missouri-Columbia
Kyungjung Han, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, California State University, Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA
Mansoo Yu, PhD, Professor, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO
Background & Purpose: Online intervention (OI)s offer a logical and feasible strategy to treat a large number of middle-aged adults with overweight and obesity, who are especially vulnerable to chronic diseases. There is not much evidence on evaluating intervention features and methodological quality and comparing the effectiveness of different OIs and non-OIs. This review study features three aims: to evaluate the methodological quality and features of OIs for weight loss, to examine the associations between the methodological quality, intervention features and the effectiveness of OIs, and to compare the effectiveness among different intervention modalities.

Method: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO to retrieve articles published in the past two decades. A total of 29 OI trials were selected using inclusion criteria (i.e., RCTs, middle-aged adults, and an OI for weight loss) and evaluated methodological quality using 10 criteria (e.g., more than 6-month follow-up and at least 70% retention at follow-ups), and intervention features (e.g., opportunities for interactions with health professionals or other participants). In accordance with MOOSE guidelines, we used narrative summary tables to review the selected 29 RCTs. Using RevMan 5.2 software, a set of meta-analyses were performed to synthesize the data and compare the effectiveness of OIs versus non-OIs–e.g., self-directed management and personal care. CMA 3.0 was used to test the relative effects of demographics, methodological quality and intervention features.

Results: Results of systematic review showed the mean methodological quality score of the trials was 12.1 (out of 16), and the mean intervention features score was 6.6 (out of 8). Use of blinding and multisite trials were the main difference between higher and lower scores of quality. Opportunity for interactions with professionals and other participants were the differences between higher and lower scores of features. RCTs with higher scores of methodological quality and intervention features were more effective in weight loss than those with lower scores. Results of meta-analyses showed that OIs were significantly more effective than non-OIs (18 trials, n=4,326; standardized mean difference [SMD], –1.74, 95% CI, –2.32 to –1.17; I2=99%). Compared to OIs only, OIs with interactions with other participants (6 trials, n=1,070; SMD, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.03–1.17; I2=93%) and professionals (6 trials, n=1,137; SMD, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.08–0.59; I2=76%) were more effective. However, there was no difference in weight loss between OIs only and in-person interventions. Results of meta-regression analyses showed that methodological quality was the only significant predictor of OIs versus non-OIs (B = -0.856, SE = 0.279, 95% CI [ -1.4042, -0.3088], P < .01).

Conclusions & Implications: Both methodological quality and intervention features were important to increase the effectiveness of OIs for weight loss. OIs should be based on rigorous methodological quality. OIs with interactions with others and professionals were more beneficial for middle-aged overweight and obese adults than OIs only. We also found that OIs were effective as much as in-person interventions for weight loss. These results should be incorporated into designing an OI to enhance its effectiveness.