Abstract: Weapon-Carrying Among Court-Involved Youth: A Risk and Resilience Comparison with Aggression (Society for Social Work and Research 27th Annual Conference - Social Work Science and Complex Problems: Battling Inequities + Building Solutions)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Mountain Standard Time Zone (MST).

SSWR 2023 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Phoenix A/B, 3rd floor. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 9. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

627P Weapon-Carrying Among Court-Involved Youth: A Risk and Resilience Comparison with Aggression

Sunday, January 15, 2023
Phoenix C, 3rd Level (Sheraton Phoenix Downtown)
* noted as presenting author
Patricia Logan-Greene, PhD, Associate Professor, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
Christopher M. Fleming, PhD, Research Scientist, Boise State University, Boise, ID
Paula Nurius, PhD, Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Background: After a steady decline for decades, violent crimes, including firearm injuries, have been increasing dramatically for the past few years (Ssentongo et al., 2021). Most firearms injuries occur among those ages 15-34 (Kaufman et al., 2021); thus, understanding weapon carrying among youth is more important than ever. Youth involved with the juvenile court system are at heightened risks of weapon carrying and of injury, yet their patterns and correlates of weapon carrying have rarely been examined. This study undertakes an ecological examination of risk and resilience factors that may be related to weapon-carrying among court-involved youth, simultaneously comparing these analyses to histories of aggression to determine what might be unique to weapons.

Methods: Administrative assessment data derive from a diverse sample (N=5,378) of moderate- to high-risk youth on probation in a Northwestern state. Two questions addressed weapons carrying: whether youth had ever had a referral for a weapons charge and whether youth had ever used or threatened someone with a weapon. Bivariate analyses were first conducted with a multi-domain examination of individual histories, risk factors, school problems, family and peer influences. Next, a series of logistic regressions tested the contribution of each set while controlling for demographic factors; the same sets were compared to aggression using linear regression.

Results: 14.2% of the sample reported carrying weapons; they were more likely to be male (15.7% compared to 9.7% females), and slightly more likely to be African American/Black and Mixed/other race; age and family SES variables were not significantly different. At the bivariate level, significant differences were found based on protective skills (e.g., impulse control), current mental health/suicidality, school problems, supportive families, and antisocial beliefs/affiliations. Contrary to expectations, histories of childhood adversity and substance use were not related to weapon carrying. Different patterns emerged when comparing multivariate results of weapon carrying to aggression. Many variables that were related to weapon carrying at the bivariate level did not retain significance in logistic regressions; items that did included impulse control, school problems (but not special education), prosocial beliefs, and gang affiliations. Aggression had strong associations with some factors that were unrelated to weapon carrying in the multivariate context, even after controlling for demographics.

Discussion: An overall picture of weapon carrying among court-involved youth emerges from this analysis that has strong implications for clinicians involved with such high-risk populations, especially in comparison to differences in the models explaining aggression. The lack of significant associations with substance use and childhood adversity are surprising and merit careful attention to theories explaining why some youth carry weapons and others do not. Conversely, findings around mental health problems and overall patterns of antisocial beliefs and behavior are congruent with past research conducted on samples from the general youth population. Many assessment tools for use with high-risk populations may not capture risk factors that are unique to weapon carrying (Koh et al., 2020), indicating a need for focused research to identify and validate those tools in order to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with weapons such as firearms.