Methods: This study used data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS), a longitudinal birth cohort study of children born in 1998-2000 across 20 U.S. cities. The final analysis sample included 3,775 mothers and their children. Residential mobility was measured as the cumulative number of residential moves between birth and age 5 years; at ages 1, 3, and 5, mothers reported the number of residential moves they experienced since the last interview and these three values were summed to represent early childhood residential mobility. Neighborhood collective efficacy at age 9 was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, reflecting the mother’s perceptions of social cohesion (4 items) and informal social control (4 items). Adolescents’ behavioral development at age 15 was measured with two subscales from the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 (CBCL/ 6-18): internalizing (8 items) and externalizing (20 items) behaviors. Adolescents’ gender, mother’s race/ethnicity, mother’s education, mother’s age, marital status, and household poverty were included as covariates. All research questions were examined through findings from path analyses conducted using Mplus v.8.6.
Results: The path model had a good overall fit: CFI= .92, RMSEA= .06 (90% CI= .052-.069), and SRMR = .04. Early childhood residential mobility was directly associated with adolescents’ internalizing (β = .063, p < .01) and externalizing (β = .080, p < .001) behaviors. As hypothesized, perceived neighborhood collective efficacy partially mediated the associations between residential mobility and internalizing (indirect effect: β=.005, p <.05), and externalizing (indirect effect: β=.003, p <.05) behaviors, respectively. Higher residential mobility in early childhood was associated with lower levels of neighborhood collective efficacy, which in turn was associated with increased risk for adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing behaviors.
Conclusions and Implications: This study provides evidence of the direct effect of early childhood residential mobility on adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing behaviors, and the indirect effect of neighborhood collective efficacy on these associations. These findings underline the need for policy interventions targeting young children and their families who experience frequent residential moves in order to prevent potential later adverse outcomes in adolescence. Additionally, this study highlights that professionals who interact with highly mobile families should develop interventions to maximize social cohesion and informal social control in communities to support optimal child and adolescent development.