Abstract: The Administrative Burden of ‌playing the Game:� Implications for Social Work with SSI/DI Beneficiaries (Society for Social Work and Research 27th Annual Conference - Social Work Science and Complex Problems: Battling Inequities + Building Solutions)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Mountain Standard Time Zone (MST).

SSWR 2023 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Phoenix A/B, 3rd floor. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 9. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

644P The Administrative Burden of ‌playing the Game:� Implications for Social Work with SSI/DI Beneficiaries

Sunday, January 15, 2023
Phoenix C, 3rd Level (Sheraton Phoenix Downtown)
* noted as presenting author
Katie Savin, PhD, Assistant Clinical Professor, University of the Pacific, Sacramento, CA
Background and Purpose:

Over 13 million adults in the U.S. under the age of 65 receive SSI (Supplemental Security Income) and/or (Social Security Disability Insurance) benefits as their primary source of income, yet over 40% of these individuals live in poverty. In order to make ends meet, SSI/DI beneficiaries must navigate a complex web of social welfare policies, interlocking benefit programs and social stigma. This study seeks to deepen understanding of the impacts of living on SSI/DI benefits through the experiences of beneficiaries alongside the specific policies they must navigate.


Employing a qualitative methodology, this study explores how disabled people in California’s Bay Area make ends meet on SSI/DI benefits and investigates how these experiences impact beneficiaries’ sense of self and identity. Using a purposive sampling strategy coupled with snowball sampling approach, 33 working-age adults (ages 18-65) receiving SSI and/or SSDI benefits are recruited to participate in the study. Participants are interviewed in an in-depth semi-structured format using an interview guide followed by four member-check groups. A constructivist grounded theory approach to data analysis is used to analyze findings using the qualitative data analysis software, Dedoose. Throughout, a Critical Disability Studies (CDS) theoretical foundation guides the study.


One of three major themes that emerged from this study is entitled, the administrative burden of “playing the game.” Many participants describe their experience struggling to survive while navigating SSI/DI benefits alongside other welfare programs as, “playing the game. Their experiences obtaining and maintaining benefits with restrictive conditions on earnings and assets align with the public policy concept of “administrative burden.” Examples of administrative burden for participants include documenting and reporting work activity, receiving and responding to overpayments, and regular interactions with the SSA to provide evidence of ongoing disability and assets totaling no more than $2,000. The constant surveillance of participants’ bank accounts and disability status lent to a chronic stress of losing the benefits that could barely sustain them, as well as experiences of stigma, anxiety, and frustration alongside material deprivation.

Conclusions and Implications:

While scholarship is robust on the experiences in many areas of the welfare state and for disability in general, there is little research that explores the intersection of these two stigmatized categories embodied by SSI/DI beneficiaries. This population is ripe for social work intervention as this study found implications for policy, practice and research. Policy recommendations address SSA policies that disincentivize SSI/DI beneficiaries’ labor market involvement; create rigid and encompassing conditions set on benefit maintenance; and other aspects of SSA policy such as eliminating differential treatment of SSI versus SSDI beneficiaries. Implications for social work practice include attending to the psychosocial issues that arise in navigating benefit policy, providing support to reduce administrative burden, and developing infrastructure to support confidential peer-based networks of SSI/DI beneficiaries. Lastly, future disability policy research would benefit from employing the CDS framework that emphasizes the narratives of disabled people in research and seeks to assess policy efficacy through their experiences of it.