Methods: Data come from the Eating and Activity of Time (EAT) 2010-2018 study, a population-based, longitudinal study of eating, activity, and weight-related attitudes, behaviors, and associated sociocultural factors from adolescence (M = 14.2 years-old) to adulthood (M = 22.1 years-old). Respondents (n = 1,518) were predominantly female (52.9%) and racial and ethnically diverse. Participants reported whether they experienced food insecurity and/or received SNAP in the prior year as well as whether a household member went to prison prior to their 18th birthday. Descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regression models were used for study analyses.
Results: Overall, 11.6% of emerging adults (n = 176) reported having had a parent or household member go to prison. Household incarceration was associated with increased odds of food insecurity in adolescence (OR = 1.64 [1.24, 2.17], p < .001) and emerging adulthood (OR = 3.01 [2.14, 4.22], p <.001) after adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, and SES. Almost two-thirds of youth (63.3%) who experienced both household incarceration and food insecurity in adolescence remained food insecure as emerging adults, relative to 49.2% of youth without household incarceration history. For young people with a history of household incarceration, 50.8% of those receiving SNAP benefits were food insecure. Conversely, among youth without such a history, only 29.7% of those receiving public assistance were food insecure.
Conclusions and Implications: Findings from this study extend the documented link between household incarceration and food insecurity in childhood, with evidence that food insecurity persists into adolescence and emerging adulthood. Results also suggest SNAP benefits may be less protective in mitigating food insecurity within households where incarceration has occurred. These findings are concerning given individuals who experience food insecurity are at heightened risk for developing an eating disorder, which may be compounded by experiences of trauma and systemic injustice. These results have important implications for policies that amend eligibility criteria for public assistance programs in the context of incarceration and argue for the expansion of programs and services that support, rather than reduce, food access and financial assistance.