Man O'war Project PTSD-Equine Assisted Assisted Therapy Project: Mixed Methods Findings from a Fieldsite

Background and Purpose: While there are many programs exist that support Veterans through wellness, well-being and social/peer support, the rate of Veteran suicide is still unacceptable, between 22 and 44 deaths by suicide and/or self-injury daily. The demand for Equine Assisted services (EAS) has increased exponentially, however, the research is just beginning to take rigorous steps in methodology. There is no existing standard of practice, defined certification required, or accessible (financial or regional) training for practitioners, nor a unified manual, protocol, or curriculum. The Man O'War Project (MoW Project) partnered with Columbia University to create and test a standardized curriculum that could be disseminated to other trained professionals, delivered universally, in an accessible format. The initial study objectives sought to explore: novelty, fidelity, and mechanisms of change. The second iteration of this study was to recruit teams of credentialed professionals to attend a training to learn to deliver the curriculum. This poster presents findings from the training and curriculum delivery to Veterans, focusing on client process and well-being outcomes.

Methods: The program consisted of Licensed Mental Health Clinicians and Equine Specialist trained in the curricula, horses, and Veterans as participants (N=14). The program was offered weekly for 8-weeks to groups of up to six Veterans working from the ground with horses in partnership. Using a strengths-based approach, the Veterans were tasked with activities to move through the concepts of increasing social-emotional skills, recognizing emotions, goal setting & problem solving, and self-regulation. Groups took place between July and September 2023. Participants were predominantly male (n=11), white (n=11), and ranged in age from 35-85 with no dominant age range. Veterans completed the PCL-5 pre/post intervention and a program evaluation questionnaire. All data was de-identified and provided back to PATH Intl to be used in aggregate with other Centers providing this program.

Results: Veterans attended an average of 6.25 sessions out of the eight sessions offered. They self-reported enjoyment of all core activities, though leading with the most highly rated. Veterans’ perceptions of the intervention was that their anxiety decreased, they bonded with the horse, improved their mindfulness, and increased their confidence. Interestingly, participants shared that they were triggered by the name of the project as they did not identify as a “Man O'War '' and were not familiar with the racehorse by the name. Post-assessment scores on the PCL-5 decreased from above the clinical range for PTSD to below. All measures of the sub-scales (hypervigilance, negative thoughts and beliefs, avoidance and flashbacks) decreased from the pre-intervention to the post-intervention. While not significant, the total score change from pre to post had a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d=.43).

Conclusions and Implications: These findings validate the on-going research to implement this study at additional PATH Intl Centers. The qualitative feedback from the Veterans supports that the horses provide a present point of connection that has been echoed in the research for decades. The potential implications for practice include a valid and reliable training and protocol for providing EAS to Veterans.