Abstract: Perceptions of Moud Implementation Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Guided By the Epis Framework (Society for Social Work and Research 28th Annual Conference - Recentering & Democratizing Knowledge: The Next 30 Years of Social Work Science)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Eastern Standard Time Zone (EST).

SSWR 2024 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Marquis BR Salon 6, ML 2. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 11. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

Perceptions of Moud Implementation Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Guided By the Epis Framework

Schedule:
Sunday, January 14, 2024
Marquis BR Salon 7, ML 2 (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Melanie Nicholls, PhD, Assistant Professor, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Lianne Urada, PhD, Associate Professor, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Background: Barriers and facilitators for medication use for opioid use disorders (MOUD) have been researched at the patient, provider, and system levels. This study took an implementation science approach to examine providers' perceived implementation barriers and facilitators of MOUD.

Methods: Purposive and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit providers (N=21) who worked closely with MOUD in San Diego County from September 2019-February 2022. The interviews lasted from 30 to 60 minutes. Situational analysis was used as a methodological approach to explore the data and map out the human and non-human elements in the interviews. Elements from the situational analysis were then mapped onto the constructs of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, and interviews went through a second phase of coding.

Results: 21 participants working in the substance use field were interviewed, consisting of directors of MOUD programs, health care practitioners, and behavioral health practitioners, Elements of the EPIS constructs pertaining to the outer and inner contexts were found to be both facilitators and barriers of MOUD implementation. For the outer contexts, elements include the service environment and policies, funding for MOUD, funding for patients’ needs, funding for providers, inter-organizational environment and networks, and patient/client characteristics. The inner context elements consisted of leadership, training, organizational characteristics, and individual characteristics of adopters.

Conclusion: Decreasing policy and regulatory barriers can increase MOUD access. Introducing less stringent guidelines has been associated with more physicians prescribing MOUD. The United States healthcare landscape is not conducive to treating substance use disorders, and the disconnect between treatment and insurance creates barriers to care. Further research on training physicians and creating curriculums for future providers are pertinent for the future of MOUD implementation.