Methods: This study employed survey data collected in 2021 from a national sample of college students in South Korea (N=1,067). The study included a balanced ratio of the sample in sex (female vs. male) and geographic locations (Seoul vs. other cities). The sample was 21.8 years old on average. The short version of the DJGLS consisted of six items, three items respectively for emotional loneliness and social loneliness (1=none of the time to 5=all of the time). We tested (1) confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to determine the factor structure of the DJGLS, (2) internal consistency reliability, and (3) correlations with self-rated general health (1=poor to 5=excellent) and psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-4) to assess the concurrent validity.
Results: The mean scores were 2.56 for items in emotional loneliness and 2.66 for items in social loneliness. In agreement with the previous literature, we identified a two-factor CFA model with six items (emotional and social loneliness). The model fits were acceptable, except RMSEA (χ²(8) = 273.035, p < .001; RMSEA 90% CI: 0.158~0.193; CFI = .985; TLI = .973, SRMR = 0.048). We found one item in emotional loneliness (i.e., I miss having people around me) cross-loaded on the factor of social loneliness. We removed the item, following the literature guidelines and substantial interpretation. The revised model with five items has an excellent model fit: (χ²(4) = 9.465, p = .051; RMSEA 90% CI: 0.000~0.066; CFI = 1.000; TLI = 0.999; SRMR = 0.007). All factor loadings were over 0.73 and statistically significant (p < .001). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable (emotional loneliness: α = .66; social loneliness: α = .91). Overall loneliness and two subscales of emotional and social loneliness were negatively associated with health and psychological distress.
Implications and Conclusion: The short version of the DJGLS is overall a reliable and valid scale to measure loneliness in Korean young adults. The study suggests an adapted application of removing one item for better estimation in Korea. We will discuss cultural differences and considerations to best inform social work practice and research in diverse contexts.