Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley’s methodology, our team of community and academic social workers conducted a Scoping Review to explore the value of social work interventions across healthcare settings. The team worked closely with a medical reference librarian to identify search terms and used Covidence to manage the search and article selection. Our inclusion criteria included: 1) social workers had to be explicitly identified as members of the care team; 2) value-based outcomes had to be included in the study results; 3) interventions had to occur in a healthcare facility which included inpatient and outpatient, behavioral health, residential, home-based, and public health settings; 4) the target population had to have at least one health condition; 5) the intervention was focused on at least one health condition; 6) articles had to be peer-reviewed publications on original work, i.e., opinion pieces, dissertations, and existing literature reviews were excluded from the full-text extraction; 7) interventions occurred in the United States; 8) articles were in English; and 9) articles were published between 1/2010-10/2021.
Results: A total of 7415 abstracts were identified and reviewed by at least 2 members of our team. Additionally, 629 full-text articles were reviewed and 416 were excluded from data extraction for the following reasons: 1) 57% (n=238) either did not have or explicitly identify a social worker as part of the care management team; 2) 15% (n=62) did not discuss value-based outcomes; 3) 14% (n=59) were not peer-reviewed articles; and 4) 14% (n=57) did not discuss an intervention, did not present outcomes, or did not occur in a healthcare facility in the United States. Of the 213 articles selected for data extraction, we obtained the following information: 1) study design; 2) patient populations; 3) study settings; and 4) whether the interventions are SW led or SW as a part of the team.
Conclusions and Implications: Social workers are integral members of healthcare teams, however, the research on their unique value is limited. One possible contributor is that social workers are not adequately identified in the literature, as a lack of identification was the primary reason for exclusion in this study. Thus, more research on the unique value of social work and measuring the efficacy of social worker interventions is critical.