Methods: This study used administrative child welfare records from California’s CWS case management database, county-level CSEC program implementation records, and survey responses from 47 county child welfare agencies that received funding through SB 855. We described child welfare system performance outcomes and examined associations between county-level implementation and CWS responses to CSE. Child Protective Services (CPS) reports and CWS client-level case notes were used to identify minors with some documented CSE concern identified by opted-in counties between state fiscal years 2015 and 2021. County characteristics and SB 855 implementation scores were grouped by terciles (low, medium, high). Chi-squared tests were used to identify differences in CSE identification and case openings by implementation.
Results: The magnitude of the detected problem is small: On average, the child population residing in opted-in counties between 2015-2022 totaled about 9.1 million, and 40,389 minors had CSE concerns identified in opted-in counties during that time. Of those identified, 9,366 minors (24.5%) had confirmed CSE victimization. Among all minors with some CWS-identified CSE concern, 16% had a prior closed CWS case, 14.2% had an open case at the time CSE was identified and 19.5% had a case opened after CSE identification. Chi-squared findings revealed significant differences in identification of CSE victimization (p<.001) and case openings (p<.001) by counties’ overall implementation score.
Conclusions and Implications: Findings from this study reveal significant heterogeneity in the identification of CSE victimization and case openings following CSE identification among county-operated child welfare agencies in California. These results likely reflect both potential variation in the incidence of sexual exploitation within specific counties, as well as how effective county CSEC programs are in identifying youth experiencing sexual exploitation. Findings from this analysis will drive continuous quality improvement efforts within California. Further, these findings can inform CSE prevention and intervention efforts in other states with locally-administered child welfare services.