Method: I examined four databases using the search terms ("guaranteed basic income" OR "universal basic incomeā) and ("RCT" OR "randomized controlled trial" OR "randomly controlled" OR "randomized control group" OR "randomly assigned" OR "randomly controlled experiment" OR "experimental studies" OR "experimental design" OR "clinical trial" OR "quasi-experimental design" OR "quasi-experimental") with the aims of identifying primary studies that reported outcomes of guaranteed basic income or universal basic income not limited to only the United States. In addition to the databases that were searched, I also searched grey literature to include final reports that were not published in peer-reviewed journals. The search included literature within the last ten years published in English.
Results: I identified an initial 142 studies related to the search terms and found six total articles that evaluated outcomes of guaranteed basic income or universal basic income using experimental designs both in the United States and outside.
Conclusion and Implications: Despite their recent popularity, there is little evidence that basic income programs implemented within the United States are effective simply because of the scarcity of outcome studies. Studies outside of the United States are limited as well, but overall show diverse benefits. While these studies may inform further discussion, decision-making, and planning for implementing similar programs within the United States, it is imperative to take into consideration the vast cultural, societal, economic, and political dissimilarities present.