Abstract: Perinatal Mental Health Screening: Investigating the Perspectives and Experiences of Those Who Have Given Birth (Society for Social Work and Research 28th Annual Conference - Recentering & Democratizing Knowledge: The Next 30 Years of Social Work Science)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Eastern Standard Time Zone (EST).

SSWR 2024 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Marquis BR Salon 6, ML 2. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 11. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

Perinatal Mental Health Screening: Investigating the Perspectives and Experiences of Those Who Have Given Birth

Schedule:
Sunday, January 14, 2024
Liberty Ballroom O, ML 4 (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Tess Carlson, MSW, Student, University of Montana, MT
Jessica Liddell, PhD, MPH/MSW, Assistant Professor, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
Sarah Reese, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
Background and Purpose:

In response to national health recommendations and the high social and economic costs of Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders (PMADs), mental health screening is being conducted at increasing rates during perinatal and well-baby checkups. Current research primarily examines perinatal mental health screening from the viewpoint of medical providers. These studies suggest that major barriers exist to connecting birthing persons with care following screening. Data, however, are limited surrounding birthing persons’ perspectives and experiences of the screening process. This study seeks to elevate the views of those who give birth to highlight the factors that they feel impact perinatal mental health screening success. This is essential data for overcoming barriers like stigma to improve screening outcomes.

Methods:

A Community Advisory Board (CAB) comprised of those with lived-experience, aided with recruitment and compiling a resource list for participants. Ten qualitative semi-structured interviews of people who have given birth since 2019 in Montana and who have experienced PMADs were conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in NVivo using qualitative descriptive methodology. The analysis was completed with input from the CAB and results shared with participants.

Results:

The results of this study indicate that interactions with providers during appointments severely impact birthing persons’ perspectives of the screening process. As described by participants, meaningful Interactions with providers contributed to an overall sense of support necessary for connecting them with care. Improvements suggested by participants include: 1) changes to the screening environment and protocols and 2) integrating explicit conversations with providers about PMADs into routine perinatal care.

Conclusions and Implications:

This study indicates that birthing persons view mental health as an integral aspect of perinatal healthcare. Implications include making reasonable changes in the screening process to significantly improve screening outcomes and educating providers about the importance of explicitly addressing perinatal mental health with regularity.