Methods: Data were derived from the second wave of China Education Panel Studies (CEPS), which is a nationally representative survey. A random sampling strategy was used in which 438 classes were randomly selected from 112 schools in 28 county-level units in Mainland China. A total of 10096 students were included in this study. Mplus 8.0 was employed to examine the proposed theoretical model. The structural equation modeling (SEM) with maximum likelihood (ML) estimation was conducted, using the bootstrapping approach (n = 2,000).
Results: The structural equation modeling analysis results showed a good fit to the data (CFI =.977, TLI = 0.968, SRMR = 0.033, and RMSEA =.049). Both positive peer affiliation and negative peer affiliation were directly associated with student academic performance (β = .224 and β = -.089, respectively). The indirect effects of positive and negative peer affiliation on academic performance through student academic engagement were, respectively, 0.032 (SE = 0.005, CI = [0.023, 0.043], P<0.001) and -0.064 (SE = 0.011, CI = [-0.088, -0.045], P < 0.001). Taken together, positive peer affiliation, negative peer affiliation, and academic engagement accounted for 12.3% of the explained variance in student academic performance (R2 = .123).
Conclusions and Implications: This study empirically supports that positive and negative peer affiliation have both direct and indirect effects on student academic performance. Specificly, positive peer affiliation has stronger direct impacts on students academic performance, while negative peer affiliation affects academic performance through decreasing engagement. Hence, school social workers, educators, and policymakers who aim at improving student academic performance may consider developing prevention and intervention programs on creating a healthy school climate and prohibiting delinquency behaviors in school. In addition, academic engagement programs should be designed especially for those affiliated with deviant peers.