Methods: The dataset included adults 18-65 years old (N=6,780) who were screened for substance use while receiving treatment (2015-2021) at a community health center in a Northeast state. For this analysis, we limited the sample to individuals with an OUD diagnosis (n=705). Using univariate statistics, we examined demographic characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, sex, healthcare plans, psychiatric diagnoses, and service utilization sessions (individual psychotherapy, group therapy, and psychiatric). Using Bayesian Information Criteria, we performed a cluster analysis to examine potential groupings. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni and chi-square tests with adjusted standardized residuals were conducted to identify characteristic differences between clusters, and service utilization differences by cluster.
Results: The sample primarily identified as Black or African American (n=282, 40.0%), male (n=498; 70.6%), and used Medicare/Medicaid for clinical services (n=527; 74.8%). Over a quarter of the sample (n=196; 27.8%) had a MHD and a second SUD diagnosis. The most prevalent co-occurring diagnoses for MHDs were depressive (n=137, 19.4%) and bipolar (n=90; 12.8%) disorders; and for SUDs were cannabis use (n=224, 31.8%) and cocaine use (n=223; 31.6%) disorders. The cluster analysis had an average silhouette of 0.5, indicative of good clustering. Six clusters were revealed and labeled: Cluster 1. “Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with SUD needs”, Cluster 2. “Private pay and charity care healthcare plan and younger with cocaine use disorder needs”, Cluster 3. “Medicare/Medicaid and other publicly-funded healthcare plans with mood disorder needs”, Cluster 4. “Private healthcare plan with low co-occurring needs”, Cluster 5. “Other publicly-funded healthcare plan and male with cannabis use disorder needs”, and Cluster 6. “Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan and older with MHD needs”. All ANOVAs for service utilization differences by cluster were significant (p<.001). In post-hoc tests, Cluster 3 had the highest number of all session types, whereas Clusters 6, 4, and 5, had the lowest number of individual psychotherapy, group therapy, and psychiatric sessions, respectively.
Conclusions and Implications: This study identified patient subtypes and their service utilization patterns at a community health center in a diverse, high-need community. The co-diagnosed conditions highlight the importance of comprehensive and integrated treatment. Importantly, patients’ healthcare plans, a socioeconomic factor that impacts access to care, plays a critical role in distinguishing treatment needs and utilization. These findings can guide assessment and treatment protocols tailored to common patient presentations and improve quality of care.