Methods: In Wave 3 of a longitudinal CDA policy experiment, we assessed parent-child engagement in education in nine items asking respondents about the frequency of their discussions with their children regarding school matters, academic progress, and future goals. The internal consistency of these items was considered acceptable (Cronbach's Alpha = .76). A three-item scale of children's hope asked respondents about children’s broad expectations of their futures, and the scale demonstrates acceptable internal consistency (0.77). Controlling baseline demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, we assessed the CDA impacts on these two outcomes in linear regression models. We applied Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) in supplemental analyses.
Results: Among the Wave 3 respondents of the CDA experiment, we found no significant differences between treatment and control groups in the majority of baseline demographic and socioeconomic variables. For the pre-COVID sample, the treatment status variable has a statistically significant positive coefficient of 0.64 to predict parent-child educational engagement and a statistically significant positive coefficient of 0.28 to predict children’s hope. After including parent-child educational engagement as an independent variable to predict children’s hope, the coefficient for the treatment status reduces to 0.06 but remains statistically significant.