Methods: Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation Panels 2001, 2004, 2008, 2014, and 2018, covering the period from October 2000 through December 2019, are utilized. The main sample consists of women who gave birth in California from 2001 to 2009 (N=2,807 births, 112,037 mother-birth-month observations). I use an event-study specification to compare the employment outcomes of mothers who gave birth after the implementation of CA-PFL (July 2004) to those who gave birth before the policy, for each year following their childbirth up to 10 years, compared to the pre-birth level.
Results: Preliminary results suggest that statistically significant positive effects are only present in the short term, particularly in the first year after childbirth. However, these effects fade over time, with no significant impact observed in the medium and long term. The positive short-term effects are particularly pronounced among first-time mothers compared to their counterparts with older children.
Conclusions & Implications: Preliminary findings confirm the short-term employment effect of CA-PFL, while its effects do not persist in the long run. This finding differs from Bailey et al. (2019), suggesting that the policy's impact immediately after implementation might differ from when the policy becomes familiar to both workers and employers. Elements of PFL that support women’s long-term employment after childbirth warrant further discussion.