Methods: Data of the study were collected through a large-scale, cross-sectional, school-based survey in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, a city adjacent to Hong Kong in Southern China, consisting of 2,610 students from the 4th to 9th grade (445 CBS, 348 NIS, 430 HKMS, and 1,387 HKLS). 26 indicators from 5 dimensions (physical health, mental health, resilience, educational outcomes, inter-personal relationships) were selected to measure different aspects of children’s well-being. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to assess the influences of school choice, residential location, migration status and migration strategy on children’s well-being.
Results: The PSM results suggest no significant impact of residential location. CBS and HKLS fare similarly across almost all well-being indicators. Migration status even leads to better development in some circumstances. NIS significantly outperformed HKLS, especially in dimensions of mental health, resilience, educational outcomes, and inter-personal relationships. Family migration strategy has mixed influences on children’s well-being. NIS demonstrate higher levels of physical health, and inter-personal relationships, and slightly lower levels of educational outcomes than CBS. Last, school location brings both benefits and costs on children. HKMS report higher levels of resilience and educational outcomes than CBS, and mixed findings appear in their physical health and inter-personal relationships.
Conclusions and Implications: Our findings reveal the complicated and multi-faceted impacts of cross-border migration between mainland China and Hong Kong. We point out that family migration strategies and school location bring both opportunities and challenges on children’s well-being. Policy and practice implications of these findings are further discussed.