Abstract: Statewide Prenatal Substance Exposure Policy & Child Welfare System Interactions (Society for Social Work and Research 29th Annual Conference)

Please note schedule is subject to change. All in-person and virtual presentations are in Pacific Time Zone (PST).

Statewide Prenatal Substance Exposure Policy & Child Welfare System Interactions

Schedule:
Friday, January 17, 2025
Boren, Level 4 (Sheraton Grand Seattle)
* noted as presenting author
Margaret Lloyd Sieger, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Connecticut, CT
Elizabeth Goldsborough, MSW, Doctoral Student, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT
Lucas Godoy, Doctoral Student, University of Connecticut, CT
Timothy Moore, PhD, Director, University of Connecticut, CT
Mishka Terplan, MD, Medical Director, Senior Research Scientist, Friends Research Institute, MD
Stephen Patrick, MD, William R. Long Director of Child Health Policy, Professor of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
Background/Purpose: Responsive to a change in federal child welfare policy, in 2019, Connecticut unveiled a statewide hospital reporting infrastructure to divert infants with prenatal substance exposure (IPSE) without child maltreatment concerns from child protective services (CPS) using a de-identified notification to CPS and a family care plan. Connecticut is the first state to implement a separate, de-identified notification system for IPSE. When historically punitive systems like CPS become pathways to accessing supportive services, scholars and advocates raise concerns about “net widening”— an unintended consequence that increases the number and scope of people under the purview of such systems. The aim of our study was to test whether Connecticut’s notification policy caused net-widening as measured by a post-policy increase in maltreatment reports or foster care placements involving IPSE.

Method: This study analyzed unlinked child welfare and vital records during a 66-month timeframe starting in March 2017 to generate our two dependent variables: (1) county-level monthly rates of screened-in CPS reports involving IPSE per 1,000 births and (2) county-level monthly proportion of screened-in IPSE reports that resulted in foster placement. We fitted a Bayesian Poisson mixed effects model with a log-link using the number of births as an offset term to estimate the rates of IPSE reports per birth at each timepoint for each of Connecticut’s seven counties (n = 517), controlling for other risk factors from the birth records (e.g., WIC participation) and COVID-19 hospitalizations. An autoregressive random effect of order one was included to account for temporal dependence. The interaction between a linear trend and policy implementation was included to test the effect of the policy on report rate while controlling for covariates. A model with the same structure was used to analyze the rate of foster care placement per IPSE report.

Results: The statewide average rate of reports involving IPSE fell from 21.3 to 18.7 per 1000 births after the policy change. Similarly, the statewide average proportion of IPSE reports that resulted in foster care placement fell from 54.5% to 43.1% after the policy change. The mixed effects model revealed that county-level IPSE report rates per birth decreased 12.7% [95% CI: 10.5-15.0%] after the policy change. In addition, county-level foster care placement rate per IPSE report decreased 21.9% [95% CI: 19.4-24.1%]. Depending on the outcome, significant covariates included rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome, maternal marital status, and familial risk level. Unit-level increases in neonatal abstinence syndrome diagnoses at birth increased both rate of reports [95% CI: 33-562%] and foster placements [95% CI: 17-976%]. Conversely, the proportion of married mothers decreased report rates [95% CI: 9-31%] and the proportion of low- and moderate-risk CPS referrals decreased foster care placement rates [95% CI: 23-72% and 8-65%, respectively].

Implications: Our findings reveal that Connecticut’s new reporting policy was associated with a reduction in both child maltreatment reports and foster care placements of IPSE. In a policy landscape that is historically associated with increasingly punitive approaches, Connecticut’s approach appears to achieve its public health goals.