Methods: Of the original 97 participants in Mason CARES, 47 caregivers participated in focus groups or individual interviews to share their experiences with each intervention. Open and substantive coding were used to analyze transcripts of 12 focus groups utilizing Dedoose, a web application for mixed-methods research. Each transcript was independently reviewed by two researchers, resulting in an agreed-upon list of codes. The highest code counts emerged as five categories. Constant comparative analysis was then used to conceptualize these categories and establish an overall theme. These systematic approaches, along with memoing and peer debriefing, were utilized to enhance the rigor of the data collection and analysis processes.
Findings: The overall theme emerging from the data is care partners benefiting from non-pharmacological interventions amid the challenges of caregiving. The categories supporting this theme are connecting, appreciating, actualizing, adapting, and challenging. "Connecting" refers to participants finding a sense of community within the stress-busting group with other caregivers undergoing similar experiences. "Appreciating" represents the benefits received and the willingness to recommend the Mason CARES program to others. "Actualizing" involves participants utilizing what was learned from the program to improve their situation. "Adapting" represents managing and often adjusting routines and interventions. "Challenging" refers to the continued emotional and physical demands of caregiving.
Conclusions and Implications: Strategies to enhance program engagement and effectiveness can be informed by assessing caregivers’ experiences and perspectives in two ways: First, program effectiveness can be enhanced by focusing on fostering social connections and information sharing among family caregivers. Second, facilitators play a crucial role in creating a supportive environment where caregivers feel comfortable sharing their own experiences and coping strategies with other caregivers.