Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across Chinese higher education institutions, obtaining 1,466 valid responses from undergraduate and graduate students. After excluding participants without dating experience, the final sample included 671 individuals (34.9% male, 65.1% female). Key variables assessed included lifetime experiences of dating violence perpetration and victimization (including psychological, physical, and sexual subscales), shame experiences (personality-, behavior-, and body-related dimensions), depression, and PTSD symptoms. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to evaluate the mediating role of shame in the pathways linking dating violence perpetration/victimization to PTSD and depression.
Results: Elevated shame levels were observed among females, upper-year students, and only children, with behavior-related shame emerging as the most prominent dimension compared to personality- and body-related facets. Structural equation modeling (SEM) for both dating violence victimization (DVV) and perpetration (DVP) demonstrated good model fit. Results revealed distinct mediation patterns: for DVP, shame fully mediated its effects on mental health outcomes, with significant indirect effects on PTSD (effect = 0.231, 95% CI [0.173, 0.288], explaining 71% of the total effect) and depression (effect = 0.164, 95% CI [0.117, 0.210], 64% of total effect); for DVV, shame partially mediated these relationships, with indirect effects accounting for 54% of PTSD (effect = 0.196, 95% CI [0.145, 0.247]) and 43% of depression (effect = 0.135, 95% CI [0.095, 0.175]).
Conclusions and Implications: This study reveals shame’s culturally distinct role as a mediator in the relation between both DV perpetration and victimization and internalizing problems. In China’s collectivist context, where shame is weaponized in relationships to control partners through humiliation, interventions must address its’ mental health risk. Culturally tailored strategies should integrate self-compassion training to disrupt self-attack cycles while leveraging communal support frameworks to mitigate shame-driven stigma. Universities and policymakers must prioritize DV prevention programs that address shame’s cultural embeddedness, particularly its normalization in intimate control tactics.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)