Abstract: Preliminary Results from the Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (GIFT) Trial: Impacts of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Financial and Health Outcomes in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Advanced Cancer (Society for Social Work and Research 30th Annual Conference Anniversary)

Preliminary Results from the Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (GIFT) Trial: Impacts of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Financial and Health Outcomes in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Advanced Cancer

Schedule:
Friday, January 16, 2026
Independence BR F, ML 4 (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Meredith Doherty, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania, PA
Joey Tan, MSW, Doctoral student, University of Pennsylvania, PA
Background:
Low-income individuals with advanced cancer face disproportionate financial hardship due to high out-of-pocket costs, income loss, and limited access to social safety net supports. Financial toxicity—defined as the material, psychological, and behavioral burden of cancer-related costs—is associated with lower quality of life, reduced treatment adherence, and worse survival. Guaranteed income programs, which provide unconditional cash transfers, have been proposed as a structural intervention to mitigate financial hardship among medically vulnerable populations. The Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (GIFT) Trial is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a guaranteed income on financial and health outcomes in cancer patients.

Methods:
GIFT is a two-arm randomized controlled trial enrolling 250 Pennsylvania Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced cancer receiving care at academic and community cancer centers in Philadelphia. Participants were randomized 1:1.5 to receive either: (1) $1,000 per month in unconditional cash payments for 12 months (intervention), or (2) usual care (control). This preliminary analysis assesses short-term outcomes at 3 months post-baseline. Primary outcomes include financial toxicity (measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), and secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression (measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scales), and food security (USDA 6-item short form). T-tests were used to compare within and between group changes in primary outcomes.

Results:
At 3 months, 51% of participants completed follow-up assessments. The groups were balanced on sociodemographic and outcome measures. Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed greater reductions in financial toxicity (mean COST score change: intervention = -5.3, control = -1.27 p < .001) and food insecurity (mean FS score change: intervention = -0.98, control = + 0.15 p < .001) Significant improvements were also observed in HRQoL domains of energy/fatigue and pain among intervention participants.

Conclusions:
Preliminary findings from the GIFT Trial suggest that unconditional monthly cash transfers may significantly reduce financial toxicity and improve health-related quality of life and food security within 3 months. These results underscore the potential of guaranteed income as a scalable, non-medical intervention to address structural determinants of health in oncology. Longer-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analyses are underway to inform policy and practice implications.