METHODS: In 2010, a local news program and newspaper in a southeastern community published stories about two different research studies focused on African American health disparities. Forty-three different individuals responded online to both stories, resulting in 100 responses. Content analysis of the responses was conducted inductively by three independent coders who identified six common themes.
RESULTS: There was a perception that health differences by race were “manufactured truth.” The naming of health disparities between racial groups was deemed to be a political act put forth by “leftist liberal” researchers and media outlets. When disparities were acknowledged, they were attributed to individual-level factors and negative perceptions of African Americans. Overall, respondents did not see a history of racism and discriminatory practices as important contributors to health disparities. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest that many respondents did not believe that health disparities were valid or real phenomena. Social work researchers need to take into account the racialized contexts in which research is conducted. Endemic racism and discrimination not only affect the significance of “naming” disparities as a problem, but also social work research and intervention strategies.
Jones, C. P. (2002). Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. In T. A. LaVeist (Ed.), Race, ethnicity, and health (pp. 311-318). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Services, U. S. D. o. H. a. H. (2000). Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health (2 ed.). Washington: Government Printing Office. Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60 (1), 16-26. Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., & Nelson, A. R. (Eds.). (2003). Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington: National Academies Press.