Method: Pilot data were collected from 47 WLH. To gather social network data, the interviewer used the Social Network Interview iPad application. Measures included disclosure of HIV-status and perceived social support. Basic demographics were collected via a complimentary survey. Statistical analysis proceeded in two stages, descriptive statistics and Hierarchical Linear Modeling.
Results: There were a total of 722 dyadic relationships, with an average of 17.61 network members. Women disclosed at an average of 64.95%. A majority, 80.89%, of network members provided emotional support, however neither emotional support nor instrumental support were significant predictors of HIV disclosure. Women were 4 times more likely to disclose to people they had close relationships with and 26 times more likely to disclose to people they perceived were HIV positive. Church members were the only social members listed with a decreased likelihood of being disclosed to (97%). Surprisingly, significant others as well as family members were not significant in the disclosure model.
Conclusions: Few studies have systematically collected social network data, limiting our understanding of network characteristics and ways in which networks impacts disclosure. This study indicated that the type of relationships women have with their network members (i.e. a person she is close to, she believes is HIV positive) may be more important in understanding to whom women disclose, when accounting for types of support provided or who they are to the women (i.e. significant other, sister, brother, mother, child). Future HIV intervention work should consider including close friends and other HIV positive persons in the interventions to assist with access to HIV-related care and treatment adherence.