Methods: This is a formative and summative process evaluation analyzing both the process and the outcomes of this youth-led community-based participatory research. We set out to identify the most important features for program success and program aspects we would change to improve the process and outcomes. Specifically, we examined the different inputs into the program as correlated to their differing outcomes. We also highlight those lessons learned by researchers to improve the overall quality and research process as we seek the most relevant and culturally specific interventions.
Results: We describe the most important factors for an effective youth-led community-based participatory research project, particularly a project with youth in underperforming high schools. We examine the following outputs and outcomes: hours together (75 hours), mentoring from trusted adults ( 2), interview with students (10), interviews of medical professionals (3), meetings with community members (3), curriculum topics (4) and related tasks (12), transportation home, meals at meetings, size of student cohort (6), report of findings (2), research product/short film (1), incentive payments, and pre/post assessment (1).
Conclusions/Implications: This youth-led community-based research project significantly added to the overall contribution of community specific knowledge to create a relevant and culturally specific intervention for high school youth, in addition to improving the science skills, self-esteem, and educational trajectories of youth. We seek to build upon the success of the Homewood Pitt-Bridge project as a way to both enhance community research and contribute to the social, academic and leadership development of local youth. We seek to adapt this research project to make it more effective in the future, particularly as part of a summer program or a high school course for college credit through University of Pittsburgh.