Method: Using a critical discourse analysis, this study aims to identify the dominant ideologies, which underlie health and social science research on HIV prevention with YMISM. The search of research literature published between 2000 to 2014 produced 21 articles. Through a systematic coding process, common themes emerged from the texts and were analyzed with reference to current social service models.
Results: The findings of this analysis suggest that a neoliberal ideology has obscured the social and structural mechanisms including racism, socio-economic factors, homophobia, and sexual stigma that may be predisposing YMISM to a higher risk of contracting HIV. Furthermore, the current body of scholarship has homogenized YMISM by narrowly referring to behavioral aspects of sexuality. As a result, policy recommendations provided by these studies are largely in tune with the neoliberal ideologies in which YMISM are expected to reduce their number of sexual partners, minimize risky sexual activities, and avoid substance use in sexual situations. Many studies even reinforce medicalization and the stigmatization of deviance among YMISM, positioning them as reckless risk-takers, while dismissing the resilience of these young men.
Conclusions and Implications: In order to counteract neoliberal ideologies and behavioral bias while promoting resilience discourses on YMISM, we argue for the importance of rethinking the dominant behavioral assumptions behind this group. Furthermore, we urge social work researchers and policy-makers to pay greater attention to the socio-structural conditions that systematically engender the risk of HIV and STIs. Finally, recommendations are provided on sexual rights, sexual health education and further research on sexuality concerning YMISM.