METHODS: Data were analyzed from a subsample of trauma-exposed heroin users (N = 63) residing in a long-term therapeutic community who had participated in a previously published RCT (Garland et al., 2016). All participants had been formerly homeless and many had histories of incarceration. These participants were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of MORE (n = 18), CBT (n = 33), or TAU (n = 12). Pre- and post-treatment, participants completed measures of craving, PTSD symptoms, and mindfulness. Linear mixed modeling was used to test study hypotheses with an intention-to-treat framework, after covarying individual differences in readiness to change. In analysis models, we dummy coded treatment condition into two planned custom contrasts of MORE vs. CBT and MORE vs. TAU.
RESULTS: Craving and PTSD symptoms were significantly positively associated, r = .62, p <.001, such that heroin users with higher levels of PTSD symptoms reported more severe craving. Significant treatment X time interactions were observed for craving, such that MORE resulted in greater decreases in craving than CBT [F(1,28.26) = 4.63, p = .04] and TAU [F(1,26.73) = 5.33, p = .03]. Similarly, significant treatment X time interactions were observed for PTSD symptoms, such that MORE resulted in greater decreases in PTSD symptoms than CBT [F(1,26.21) = 13.12, p = .001] and TAU [F(1,25.64) = 7.66, p = .01].
CONCLUSIONS: MORE produced significantly greater improvements in craving and PTSD symptoms than CBT and TAU in this subsample of heroin users with lifetime trauma histories. Given this demonstration of preliminary efficacy, MORE should now be tested in a future, large-scale RCT as a treatment for opiate (heroin) use disorder.