Abstract: Role of Religiosity in Gender Role Attitudes and Intimate Partner Violence-Supporting Attitudes: Implications for Violence Prevention (Society for Social Work and Research 23rd Annual Conference - Ending Gender Based, Family and Community Violence)

Role of Religiosity in Gender Role Attitudes and Intimate Partner Violence-Supporting Attitudes: Implications for Violence Prevention

Schedule:
Saturday, January 19, 2019: 9:45 AM
Union Square 20 Tower 3, 4th Floor (Hilton San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Y. Joon Choi, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Abha Rai, MSW, PhD Student/Research Assistant, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Mieko Yoshihama, PhD, Professor, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, MI
Background and Significance: Past research has shown significant relationships between less egalitarian gender role attitudes and intimate partner violence (IPV)-supporting attitudes and IPV perpetration. This implies the importance of promoting egalitarian gender role attitudes in prevention of IPV. The Asian Indian population in the US grew by 69.8% between 2000 and 2010, and there were about 2.9 million Asian Indians in the U.S. in 2010. While acculturation has been found to be related to various attitudes and behaviors among immigrants, religiosity has not been investigated as a correlate of gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes among Asian Indians in the US. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among gender role attitudes, IPV-supporting attitudes, religiosity, and other factors (acculturation and gender) among Gujaratis, one of the largest Asian Indian groups in the U.S.

Methods: Data for this study was collected through computer-assisted telephone interviews conducted with a probability sample of Gujarati men and women, aged 18-64, in four urban counties in a Midwestern state in the U.S. A total of 431 participants completed the interview; many identified their faith in Hinduism and Jainism. The dependent variables were gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes, and the independent variables were religiosity, acculturation, and gender. Religiosity was measured by three variables on frequency of religious service attendance, frequency of private prayer, and perceived religiousness. Acculturation was measured as whether the participant grew up in the US or other western country. Using multiple linear regression analyses, we assessed the degree to which religiosity is associated with gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes.

Results: The findings show that the models fit the data well (all with p < 0.001) and that religiosity was significantly associated with gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes (ranged from p < 0.001 to p < 0.05). With an increase in religiosity, there was an increase in more traditional gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes. There were also significant relationships between acculturation and gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes; those who did not immigrate to the US or a western country before 17 years old endorsed more traditional gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes. However, gender was not associated with either attitudes.  

Conclusions and Implications: Using a probability sample of a growing immigrant population and focus on previously under-studied faiths—Hinduism and Jainism, this study makes unique contribution to the study of the role of religiosity in gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes. The study findings suggest that religious leaders can play important roles on changing gender role attitudes and IPV-supporting attitudes. A faith-based IPV prevention model, which engages religious leaders in IPV prevention activities such as educating congregation members about healthy intimate relationships, may be an effective IPV prevention strategy among Gujaratis.