Abstract: Childhood Adversity, Dating Violence, and Alcohol Use Among University Students (Society for Social Work and Research 23rd Annual Conference - Ending Gender Based, Family and Community Violence)

401P Childhood Adversity, Dating Violence, and Alcohol Use Among University Students

Schedule:
Friday, January 18, 2019
Continental Parlors 1-3, Ballroom Level (Hilton San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Carolina Villamil Grest, MSW, PhD Candidate, University of Southern California, LA, CA
Julie Cederbaum, MSW, MPH, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Daniel Lee, MSW, Doctoral student, University of Southern California, LA, CA
Y. Joon Choi, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Hyunkag Cho, PhD, Associate Professor, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Seunghye Hong, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Hawai`i, Honolulu, HI
Sung Hyun Yun, PHD, Associate Professor and On-Campus MSW Programs Coordinator, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
Soonok An, PhD, Assistant Professor, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC
Jungeun Olivia Lee, MSW, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Background: Childhood adversity have long-term health consequences, including increased risk of dating violence and substance use in adulthood. Dating violence is associated with increased alcohol problems. Having experienced childhood adversity may influence coping behaviors. A cumulative risk model argues that an accumulation of multiple risk factors, rather than any single risk exposure, can greatly compromise developmental outcomes. No identified studies have examined the association of the cumulative effect of experiencing childhood adversity and dating violence on alcohol use/misuse behaviors of college students. To address this gap, we used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify patterns in which experiences of childhood adversities and dating violence intersect, and investigated whether varying constellations of risk accumulation were associated with alcohol use among college students.

Methods: A multi-site study of students (N=4843) across six universities was conducted using a web-based survey platform. A convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate students from each university was collected. Childhood adversity (maltreatment, witnessing partner violence among parents, being bullied, and living in communities with high disorganization), dating violence (victimization), and alcohol use frequency and problematic drinking was assessed. Latent classes of childhood adversity and dating violence experiences were tested. Regression analyses examined the association between latent classes and alcohol misuse behaviors, accounting for demographic covariates (age, race, gender, & sexual orientation).

Results: Latent class analysis produced four classes: “experiencing no adversity or violence” (N=2350; 50%), “experiencing peer or community violence only” (N=958; 20.4%), “experiencing peer, community, and parental partner violence” (N=774; 16.5%), and “experiencing peer and community violence, and dating violence” (N=617; 13.1%). Compared to “experiencing no adversity or violence”, those in the “peer, community, and dating violence” class were more likely to report frequent alcohol use (p<.000). When using “peer, community, and dating violence” as the referent, the “peer, community, and parental partner violence” group reported less frequent alcohol use (p<.000). For problem drinking, compared to “experiencing no adversity or violence”, the “experiencing peer, community, and dating violence” (p<.000) and “experiencing peer and community violence only” (p<.000) groups reported more problem drinking.

Conclusion: While there are established links between childhood adversity and dating violence, and childhood adversity and alcohol use in early adulthood, this work highlights the importance of examining cumulative stressors to understand the alcohol misuse behaviors of college/university students. Research and practice must account for multiple risk exposures when intervening with university students, suggesting trauma-informed interventions may be most successful at providing accessible support services, responding to the effects of trauma, and reducing problematic alcohol use among university students.