Methods: To develop a whole-person profile of older adults, this study merged data from three government Bureaus: Health, Civil Affairs, and Human Resources. The study sample was comprised of 67,556 residents ages 60 and older from a southern district in China. The analyses included geo-coding and unsupervised machine learning to identify groups of older adults that appear to have greater vulnerability for negative health outcomes based on personal, social, and environmental characteristics.
Results: This study found that older adults in the district tend to be divided roughly into three clusters of vulnerability, based on the type of work they did, where they live, their level of education, and their ethnicity. One group is more likely to have worked in professional positions, live in urban settings, be more highly educated, and be of Han ethnicity. This group appears to have low levels of vulnerability for negative health outcomes. A second group tends to be composed of individuals who have worked in agricultural jobs, live in rural settings, have little or no formal education, and are ethnic minorities. A third group is primarily widows over the age of 80 with mixed experiences related to occupation, household location, education, and ethnicity. The second and third groups appear to have higher levels of vulnerability for negative health outcomes. Moreover, these three groups are differentially located, suggesting a spatial dimension to vulnerability.
Conclusions and Implications: A primary goal of this study was to test the feasibility of merging data from different government Bureaus and to use this merged data to develop practice and policy recommendations. This was highly successful in that the approached Bureaus all generously shared their data and, due to the commonly used national identification number, merging data across Bureaus was easy and accurate. However, it was less successful due to missing information in key domains. Nevertheless, the findings can serve as the basis for policy recommendations regarding what services are appropriate, where they should be located, and who should deliver them. Specifically, the local government may consider ensuring that health and social services are integrated, include a focus on prevention, and are scaled to the level of need.