Methods: I use a restricted, administrative data of child maltreatment reports from 2009 – 2016 (NCANDS) capturing the full census of N=10,225,138 reports aggregated to the county-month level. I identify the effect of access to Medicaid using the exogenous temporal and geographic variation induced by the county-level expansion in California from 2011 – 2012. I compare the pre- and post- expansion abuse and neglect rates/counts of children living in expansion counties to those in non-expansion counties with a difference-in-difference framework (DD) estimated by OLS models weighted by the county population of children younger than five. To ensure exact counterfactuals and to account for the possible presence of pre-trends and omitted variable bias, I also employ synthetic control models (SC). I test for effect heterogeneity by stratifying models by multiple markers of disadvantage and employ various sensitivity analysis.
Results: The pattern of results drawn from my preferred estimates suggests that Medicaid significantly reduces the number of maltreatment reports by up to 14.31 reports per month (5.9 percent of SD) and increases the substantiation rate by 1.02 percentage points (9.6 percent of SD). Reports made by medical personnel fall by 17 reports per county-month, suggesting that newly-enrolled families are taking advantage of the preventative aspects of Medicaid services.
Conclusions and Implications: These findings imply that expanding Medicaid reduces the probability that lower-risk families encounter CPS, allowing caseworkers to investigate and service higher-risk cases. Given that the primary population served has a higher prevalence of the major risk factors for maltreatment, expanding Medicaid to the remaining 18 states could be an efficacious solution to preventing maltreatment among young children, especially the low-to-moderate risk families, for whom the stress associated with hardship can be plausibly removed or reduced under a more generous healthcare system.