Abstract: How Do Women Respond to Spousal Violence in Deeply Patriarchal Societies? Reports from Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan (Society for Social Work and Research 23rd Annual Conference - Ending Gender Based, Family and Community Violence)

How Do Women Respond to Spousal Violence in Deeply Patriarchal Societies? Reports from Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

Schedule:
Saturday, January 19, 2019: 11:15 AM
Union Square 20 Tower 3, 4th Floor (Hilton San Francisco)
* noted as presenting author
Jildyz Urbaeva, PhD, Assistant professor, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY
Saltanat Childress, PhD, Post-doctoral Researcher, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
Jinhee Koo, MSW, Doctoral Student, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY
Background: Despite a wide scope of the social problem, social work scholarship produced limited analyses of violence against women in transitional countries. In a more specific context of domestic violence literature, evidence about women’s responses to spousal violence in patriarchal societies is limited, and systematic studies on Central Asia are practically absent. This paper contributes to filling these gaps. We explore the pathways of spousal violence leading to: 1) help-seeking from formal and informal sources; 2) perpetrating physical violence against husband; and 3) divorcing from husband. We hypothesize that women’s decisions about how to react to spousal violence are conditioned by major risk factors, such as severity of spousal violence and husband’s drinking.

Methods: We explore these mechanisms using 2012 representative surveys conducted in Kyrgyzstan (n=4,832) and Tajikistan (n=6,675) among women of reproductive age. To account for severity of spousal violence, we first develop a typology of spousal violence in each country using latent class analysis. Next, we assess mediation paths to decompose direct and indirect effects of: a) severe spousal violence; and b) husband’s drinking on women’s response. Fear of the husband and injuries induced by husband are mediating variables.

Results: The resulting typology reveals two latent classes of spousal violence: controlling behaviors of husbands (79% prevalent) versus severe mixed violence (21% prevalent). The class of severe mixed violence is associated with higher likelihood of seeking help, hitting husband, and divorce compared to the class of less severe violence. Direct effects of severe spousal violence are positive in relation to help-seeking, violence against husband, and divorcing from husband. Indirect effects of severe spousal violence via injuries are positive for help-seeking; for hitting husband; and for divorcing from husband. Indirect effects of severe spousal violence via fearing husband are mixed: positive in Kyrgyzstan for help-seeking and negative for hitting a husband and divorcing. Direct effects of husband drinking are positive for help-seeking, violence against husband, and divorcing from husband for both samples. Indirect effects of husband drinking via injuries are positive for help-seeking; hitting husband; and divorcing from husband. Indirect effects of husband drinking via fearing husband are mixed: positive for help-seeking and negative for hitting a husband and divorcing in Kyrgyzstan.

Implications: Findings of the study suggest significant implications for policy and practice. Low rates of help-seeking with both formal and informal sources and divorcing from husband as a result of violence suggest weaknesses of societal mechanisms in responding to spousal violence and highlight the need to strengthen capacities of criminal justice and welfare systems. Due to the nascent nature of social work in Central Asian region, there is a dire need to develop practice models to provide assistance to women experiencing spousal violence in the context where women are subjected to severe violence and where response mechanisms are underdeveloped.