Methods: Using data collected from an online survey of 127 members of two Southeastern Indigenous tribes, we used a series of hierarchical regressions to examine the relation between ACEs, IPV, family resiliency, social supports, and the availability of community resources and depression, anxiety, PTSD, and alcohol abuse.
Results: Consistent with our hypotheses, we found victimization and family resilience each accounted for a unique portion of the variance in mental health outcomes. Results of the final models showed IPV was positively associated with depression (B = .39, p = .05, 95%CI .013, 1.03) and alcohol abuse (B = .35, p < .001, 95%CI .10, .31). ACEs were positively associated with anxiety (B = .27, p = .01, 95%CI 14, 1.05), PTSD (B = .23, p = .04, 95%CI .01, .30), and alcohol abuse (B = .28, p = .01, 95%CI .03, .25). Conversely, family resilience was negatively associated with depression (B = -.41, p <.001, 95%CI -1.17, -.51), anxiety (B = -.32, p < .001, 95%CI -.86, -.27), and PTSD (B = -.20, p = .02, 95%CI -20, -.01) but not alcohol abuse (B = .37, p = .37, 95%CI -.10, .04).
Conclusions & Implications: These results support the notion that family violence is a risk factor for poor mental health and may drive such health disparities. Yet, family resilience was protective, indicating the need to bolster naturally-occurring, informal support networks to whom Indigenous peoples tend to turn. Given the relevance of family to resilience, mental health, and violence, family-based and culturally-grounded approaches to holistically addressing social and health disparities are warranted.