Abstract: (Withdrawn) To Tell or Not: Older Adults' Preferences on Diagnosis Disclosure of Critical Illness in China (Society for Social Work and Research 27th Annual Conference - Social Work Science and Complex Problems: Battling Inequities + Building Solutions)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Mountain Standard Time Zone (MST).

SSWR 2023 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Phoenix A/B, 3rd floor. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 9. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

(Withdrawn) To Tell or Not: Older Adults' Preferences on Diagnosis Disclosure of Critical Illness in China

Thursday, January 12, 2023
Estrella, 2nd Level (Sheraton Phoenix Downtown)
* noted as presenting author
Yifan Lou, MSW, Doctoral Student, Columbia University, New York, NY
Jinyu Liu, PhD, Associate Professor, Columbia University, New York, NY
Background: A priori of advance care planning, that older adults should know their diagnosis, is not guaranteed nor legally supported in China. Typically, doctors inform the family members of the diagnosis and prognosis of critical illness and let them decide whether to inform the patients or not. Informed by Miller’s cognitive-social health information-processing model, this study aims to explore the preferences of older Chinese on diagnosis disclosure of their critical illness and the factors related to the preference typology.

Methods: We surveyed 571 community-dwelling adults aged 50 and years older living independently in Shanghai, China from September 2021 to January 2022. We included 7 items measuring desired disclosure approach to self, to significant others, and with physicians. We characterized preference types using latent class analysis. Multinomial regression models on class memberships were conducted to test whether culture measured by Bardis familism scale, sociodemographic characteristics, and healthcare experiences were associated with the typology.

Results: Three latent classes, transparent, contradictory, and avoidant preferences, were identified. The transparent group (34%) preferred knowing their diagnosis and also respected significant others’ rights to know their diagnosis. The contradictory group (50%) had conflicting values. They preferred to know their diagnosis by discussing with physicians privately, but chose to conceal others’ diagnoses if their significant others have serious illnesses. The avoidant group (16%) preferred not to know their diagnosis and assumed that significant others hold the same preference. Respondents in transparent, contradictory, and avoidant groups don’t vary significantly on their age, gender, marital status, number of children, insurance type, self-reported health, and familism value. Increased familism was significantly related to being contradictory (RRR=1.03, p < 0.05). Relative to transparent type, having experiences of medical decision-making for family members was associated with a lower risk of being in the contradictory type (RRR = 0.47, p < 0.001). Having been hospitalized decrease the risk of being avoidant type by 52% (RRR = 0.48, p < 0.48).

Conclusions and Implications: As the first study of its kind, to our best knowledge, the results of the study can advise future legislation and service development of patients’ rights in long-term and EoL care in China, as well as in other Asian countries sharing similar cultures and customs. First, physicians and social workers are encouraged to discuss with patients on their preference of diagnosis disclosure and note patients’ preferences in their medical records. This will allow older adults to express their diverse preferences in advance, relieve families’ emotional burden on deciding whether to tell the truth to the older patients, and allow the doctors to communicate in a more person-centered approach without concerning legal threats. Second, interventions are needed to improve older adults’ knowledge related to care options and EoL care planning, since this factor is significantly related to typologies. Third, in our sample, only 15% of people prefer to be avoidant, suggesting that legislation of patients’ autonomy in medical care and EoL care planning may be a feasible next step in China with careful culturally-sensitive design.