Abstract: The Positive Early Childhood Education (PECE) Program: A Preliminary Program Evaluation in the State of Ohio (Society for Social Work and Research 28th Annual Conference - Recentering & Democratizing Knowledge: The Next 30 Years of Social Work Science)

All in-person and virtual presentations are in Eastern Standard Time Zone (EST).

SSWR 2024 Poster Gallery: as a registered in-person and virtual attendee, you have access to the virtual Poster Gallery which includes only the posters that elected to present virtually. The rest of the posters are presented in-person in the Poster/Exhibit Hall located in Marquis BR Salon 6, ML 2. The access to the Poster Gallery will be available via the virtual conference platform the week of January 11. You will receive an email with instructions how to access the virtual conference platform.

The Positive Early Childhood Education (PECE) Program: A Preliminary Program Evaluation in the State of Ohio

Schedule:
Sunday, January 14, 2024
Mint, ML 4 (Marriott Marquis Washington DC)
* noted as presenting author
Yujeong Chang, MSW, MSW Student, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI
Kathryn Maguire-Jack, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Kenneth Steinman, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Ohio State University, OH
Kathleen Roush, Clinical Professor, Ohio State University, OH
Kristopher West, PhD, Clinical Manager, Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH
Background and Purpose:
Positive Early Childhood Education (PECE) is an extension of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program, which has shown promise in reducing problematic behaviors in children, improving parents’ well-being/parenting skills, and bringing positive child welfare outcomes. PECE applies the Triple P framework to early learning settings. The purpose of this study is to report on the initial evaluation of the PECE project and show its potential to build the confidence and ability of staff in early learning settings to deal with difficult situations and develop children’s potential to the fullest.

Methods:
The present study examines the implementation of the PECE program in Ohio, focusing on two distinct components: 1) PECE Educator Training, an online training aimed at educators in early learning settings; and 2) PECE Coach Training, a live remote training for staff members in supervisory roles to be trained as PECE coaches. The evaluation involved data collection at two-time points for PECE educators (N=514; T1: pre-educator training, T2: post-educator training) and at three-time points for PECE coaches (N=54; t1: pre-coach training; t2: post-coach training, t3: follow-up). Specifically, we assessed the impact of the PECE program on educators' perceived confidence in managing child behavioral concerns as well as on PECE coaches' preparedness, confidence, and perceived proficiency in conducting coaching sessions. To measure changes, paired-sample t-tests and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to compare pre-and post-training scores for educators and coaches, respectively.

Results:
PECE educator training
The current study identified disobedience, tantrum/temper outbursts, and fighting/aggression as the most common behavioral concerns among children in early learning settings. Through the paired-sample t-tests, we found a significant improvement in educators’ perceived confidence to manage all 16 child behavioral concern items. These results suggest that the PECE educator training can effectively enhance educators’ abilities to manage a wide range of challenging behaviors in children.
PECE coach training
The results of the one-way ANOVA revealed a significant improvement in coaches’ preparedness in conducting coaching sessions on managing child behavior as well as the perceived level of proficiency in all 16 educator consultation skills. Although the confidence in conducting coaching sessions did not reach statistical significance, improvement was shown when assessed by the average. These findings suggest that the PECE coach training can effectively equip coaches with the necessary skills to support educators.


Conclusions and Implications:
The preliminary analysis of the PECE program has revealed positive outcomes for both PECE educators and coaches, demonstrating its potential to enhance the quality of early learning settings. Educators showed a significant improvement in their confidence to manage child behavioral issues, while coaches exhibited an enhanced ability to support and guide educators in managing challenging behaviors and promoting positive outcomes in early learning settings. This study has provided empirical validation for the effectiveness of the early intervention/prevention program and established a valuable database for future testing. Furthermore, these results have important implications for preventing broader issues within early learning settings, such as reducing turnover/retention rates, improving job satisfaction/self-efficacy among educators, and decreasing expulsion rates of children.